The New Predator?

Is this a neat news story or is it something for PETA to get uptight about?

Scientists at a Georgia laboratory have developed what could be a low-tech, low-cost weapon in the war on terrorism: trained wasps.

The tiny, non-stinging wasps can check for hidden explosives at airports and monitor for toxins in subway tunnels.

I vote for it’s being a neat news story.

But what’s with the headline I chose?

Well, you surely know about the Predator used by the the US military. At first it was just a remotely-controlled, air-borne, real-time, surveillance platform. Then someone got the bright idea of adding “rocket-shooting” to that description.

These wasps are presently non-stinging, right? How soon till someone gets zapped with the bright idea of taking out the “non-” part of that description?

Just a thought. A real zinger, in fact.

Secrets of Newlywed Bliss

What would you advise newlyweds? What makes any marriage work?

The readers over at World Views are offering up some very good practical advice.

You really ought to buzz over there and see how they’re responding to this challenge:

Researchers at the University of Rochester are surveying 800 newlyweds, seeking the key to newly-wedded bliss. One researcher sagely says that it all comes down to a husband and wife being nice to each other. What advice would you give to young newlyweds?

Sharon and Abbas

First Sharon has a stroke and is presently scheduled for some sort of heart surgery. Nothing major. Apparently.

Now this:

Palestinian Authority President Mahmud Abbas was urgently admitted to hospital in Ramallah, medical sources said.

The sources did not provide any additional information about his health condition or the reason for his hospital admission.

Without any doubt there a plenty of even-more-unsettled people who have high hopes riding on both of these men.

I wonder if there are as many Israelis celebrating the Abbas incident as there were Palestinians celebrating the Sharon incident.

Jones, Darwin, and God

Over at WorldViews I learned about a great piece by David Klinghoffer posted at The Seattle Times

Wrote Jones, “[M]any of the leading proponents of ID make a bedrock assumption which is utterly false. Their presupposition is that evolutionary theory is antithetical to a belief in the existence of a supreme being and to religion in general. Repeatedly in this trial, [p]laintiffs’ scientific experts testified that thetheory of evolution… in no way conflicts with, nor does it deny, the existence of a divine creator.”

As a matter of fact, Jones is wrong. Darwinism is indeed “antithetical to a belief in the existence of a supreme being and to religion in general.” There are three reasons for this, and you don’t have to be a theologian to grasp the point.

The three basic reasons he cites are these:

  1. Not all Darwinists, including the most famous and admired, share Judge Jones’ view that Darwin and God may coexist peacefully.
  2. Darwinism and religious faith begin from antithetical metaphysical assumptions.
  3. Thinkers who have tried to assert the compatibility of God and Darwin invariably end up changing the meaning of one or the other.

2006 — You Must Wait a Bit Longer

You’re going to have to wait a bit longer for 2006 to arrive.

Thus have decreed the time gurus:

Get ready for a minute with 61 seconds. Scientists are delaying the start of 2006 by the first “leap second” in seven years, a timing tweak meant to make up for changes in the Earth’s rotation.

I think that’s neat.

However, none of us should assume that this action makes our lives longer.

We should still (wisely) number our days, giving our hearts and lives to that which is right as well as to Him Who is Right.

Merry Christmas!

Please Show Your ID

My elder son and his girlfriend fly back to MO today to be with her family for Christmas. Imagine them going through security at Portland International Airport.

“May I please see your ID?” requests the ticket agent.

“We don’t have any,” replies Russell, speaking for himself and Shari.

“Don’t have any! But why not? How do you expect to get anywhere without ID?!” the stunned airline agent sputters.

“Judge John Jones says we don’t have any ID, so how can we carry it?” is Russell’s reasonable response.

Yeah, I know — my imagination here is corny at best, dumb at worst. (But it would be fun to be part of an exchange like that!)

Well…anyway.

The Jones vs Dover (I know, I know — that’s not what the case is really called) pebble is making a few ripples in the teacup.

So reports USA (Yester)day in this story:

Backers of “intelligent design” have been advising school boards to avoid lawsuits by encouraging criticism of evolution rather than mandating that students learn about intelligent design. But a judge’s ruling this week has given ammunition to those fighting challenges to evolution in three states.

In Kansas, the state board of education adopted standards that opponents say single out evolution for criticism and open the door to supernatural causation.

In Cobb County, Ga., a three-judge federal appeals panel is weighing whether to uphold a lower court ban on a textbook sticker that said evolution is “a theory, not a fact” and should be “critically considered.” The stickers were removed from more than 34,000 books in the summer.

In Ohio, the state board of education adopted a statement supporting critical analysis of evolution and lesson plans opponents say were lifted straight from creationist and intelligent design literature.

So the judge says Dover’s public school science classes can have no ID. Too bad. I wonder if they’re left with unintelligent design or intelligent chaos or unintelligent chaos. Maybe they’re just left with an identity crisis.

Come to think of it — is Judge Jones saying he has no ID?

Whatever may be the case, a majority of Dover’s citizens sided with the judge in disclaiming any ID:

In Dover last month, voters ousted eight school board members who approved the ID policy.

Maybe that’s Intelligent Democracy at work, maybe even at it’s best?

Above all, love God!

since November 9, 2005