Did President Obama Say That About Israel?

What did President Obama really say?

Some of what President Obama had to say today regarding Israel is extremely alarming (though hardly surprising) to me.

But my quibble in this post is with what is being reported about part of what he said.

Did he really call for “Israel’s return to pre-1967 borders” as the headline states above?

I didn’t listen to the speech, so I’ll stick my neck out and quote the President from the story headlined above:

“We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.”

That seems to me to say something different than what the headline says.

What say you?

My Info Is Online

Attention: Whoever Sent This Email to Me

This e-mail is to inform you that your E-mail Address has won you the sum of £3,500,000.00 (Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Pounds Sterling) from the GM LOTTERY. For your payment, you are required to contact our fiduciary agent with the contact details below:

Look, my info is already available online.

It shouldn’t be difficult for you to find a valid mailing address for me.

I know you’ll have to work harder for that information (than if I were to simply email it to you).

But I’ll compensate you handsomely for that little bit of extra work on your part. Just send me 10% of the amount you mention above…and you keep the rest.

I really could use the money, so please don’t delay.

Thank you.

Passport ‘Wisdom’

Children are no longer born to mothers and fathers.

They’re born to parents; specifically, Parent One and Parent Two.

At least so says the US Department of State. And a very sorry state that is indeed.

And it will get sorrier, is my forecast. At some point, they will “get real” and make room for Parent Three.

But never mind the forecast. Here’s shades-of-Dr-Zeuss the story:

The words “mother” and “father” will be removed from U.S. passport applications and replaced with gender neutral terminology, the State Department says.

“The words in the old form were ‘mother’ and ‘father,’” said Brenda Sprague, deputy assistant Secretary of State for Passport Services. “They are now ‘parent one’ and ‘parent two.’”

A statement on the State Department website noted: “These improvements are being made to provide a gender neutral description of a child’s parents and in recognition of different types of families.” The statement didn’t note if it was for child applications only.

The State Department said the new passport applications, not yet available to the public, will be available online soon.

Sprague said the decision to remove the traditional parenting names was not an act of political correctness.

“We find that with changes in medical science and reproductive technology that we are confronting situations now that we would not have anticipated 10 or 15 years ago,” she said.

[…]

The new gender-neutral passport application will be rolled out in February.

“Improvements”? Then we measure by different standards.

“Not an act of political correctness”? Oh. OK. Right.

“Changes in…reproductive technology”? Eh? Two men can now reproduce together? As can two women? 😯

America’s downward slide accelerates. And the condition isn’t unique to the United States.

Fishy: Zucchini-on-Bear

What a great story!

The abused, misunderstood, underappreciated zucchini gets its day (or night, rather) in the spotlight.

Too bad we weren’t able to have a garden this year. Just think for much I could be selling zucchinis on eBay or even down at the local farmers’ market.

Oh well. 🙁

But wait. I haven’t even let you read the story yet.

Police say a Montana woman fended off a bear attack with an unlikely weapon — a zucchini.

Missoula County Sheriff’s Lt. Rich Maricelli says a 200-pound black bear attacked one of the woman’s dogs just after midnight Wednesday on the back porch of her home about 15 miles west of Missoula.

When the woman, whom police did not name, tried to separate the animals, the bear bit her in the leg.

Maricelli says the woman reached for the nearest object at hand on the porch’s railing — a large zucchini that she had harvested from her garden.

The woman flung the vegetable at the bear, striking it and forcing it to flee.

Maricelli says the woman did not need medical attention. Wildlife officials were trying to locate the bear on Thursday.

Source: Mont. woman fends off bear attack with zucchini

Yup. That’s the story. Exactly as it reads at the above link. Or at least read as of 2:25 pm Pacific on September 23, 2010.

I thought it was a great story. And funny, too! I still do, in fact.

But that next-to-the-last sentence set off my Fish Alert Bells.

The woman was bit by a bear…and didn’t require medical attention?! Please!

🙄

Either that bear is a wimp — and being chased off by a vegetable may verify that — or that woman is mighty tough.

Or something is fishy about the story.

So I read it again.

Go wading into a dog-bear fight and try to separate the animals?

Maybe.

Be close enough to a bear to be bit and close enough to the porch railing to merely reach out for the Attack Vegetable…and then fling said weapon at the bear?

Maybe it’s all just a matter of semantics, but when you’re close enough to a bear for hand-to-paw and leg-to-tooth combat, you don’t fling, you clobber.

Fling, my friends, is for out-of-reach combat.

No sale.

I like zucchini. But not fishy zucchini.

Now, go ahead, tell me how you believe the story. 😯

Israel: Appeasement or Surrender?

Under this headline, Israel concedes Jerusalem before negotiations even begin, a story that begins thus:

Ahead of the start of today’s Mideast summit in Washington, the Israeli government publicly conceded sections of Jerusalem will become part of a Palestinian state while holy sites would be governed by a “special regime.”

Speaking in an interview with Israel’s Haaretz newspaper, Defense Minister Ehud Barak outlined a deal with the Palestinians: “West Jerusalem and 12 Jewish neighborhoods that are home to 200,000 residents will be ours. The Arab neighborhoods in which close to a quarter million Palestinians live will be theirs.

“There will be a special regime in place along with agreed upon arrangements in the Old City, the Mount of Olives and the City of David,” added Barak.

Barak told the newspaper what is needed “is courage to make historic, painful decisions. I’m not saying that there is certainty for success, but there is a chance. This chance must be exploited to the fullest.”

Courage? Courage?! Other words fit far better.

Furthermore, another spit-in-the-wind observation: Only Jews need make “historic, painful decisions.”

To think anything good will come of this requires a willing suspension of disbelief.

These have not been good years for Israel.

And they will get worse.

Far worse.

The Bible tells me so.

Private
Above all, love God!